Damn! And I had hopes, with the exception of a few holdouts, that we'd passed by that port!
This is not good!
Though I don't trust the man or his machine, this kind of piffle is unacceptable and very disturbing! Many of us who do not trust him and have said so publicly will come under a cloud of suspicion because of these idiots. Damn again!
Showing posts with label Bigotry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bigotry. Show all posts
Saturday, November 15, 2008
RACISM: I guess it ain't over till it's over!
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
TUESDAY'S TRANNIES: Linking the transitory (ephemera)!
Seems like everyone from Instapundit to E! to Maggie's to David Thompson offers the periodically fugacious ... if them, why not me?The GOP should learn the wisdom of this little trick ... [Snopes]--US Evangelical foreign policy over? Shouldn't have had one in the first place! [Cranmer]--Barna survey says a lot about Black, Hispanic, and born-again voters [Christian Post]--The sad shape of the US Body of Christ (see above also) - shame on us! [Christian Post]--At least someone (John Tierney) at the NYT is still thinking ... where Have All the Bigots Gone? [TierneyLab Blog]--"The four-year effort by Obama, who is [NOT] Christian, to narrow the gap between Democratic and Republican support among religious voters paid off last week when he won the race for the White House." [LAT; my insertion]--"For those of us who believe that American families should control our health-care dollars, instead of government, employers, or other 3rd parties, the recent behavior of health-care lobbyists in DC is disturbing." [PRI]--Some in UK believe racism cuts both ways ... [BNP] ... others call that claim racism [Search Light Mag] ... still others, mainly Muslim apologists and leftists, agree! [Islamophobia Watch]--Stop the divisiveness between right and left ... kill the right! [h/t News Busters]--Canada's Human Rights Commissions biggest hate group on the net says one that knows [Ezra Lavant; h/t Black Kettle]--Game, set, match ... but no reset; life has consequences! [David Warren]Barna, Bigots, Church, Censorship, Dirty tricks,
Ephemera, Evangelicals, Foreign policy, Gospel,
Hate groups, Health care, Human Rights, Humor, Racists
| |
| |
Saturday, November 08, 2008
Thursday, October 16, 2008
MUSLIMS: Who will decide the culture and traditions of your land?
Sculptures Removed from Bangladesh Airport After Muslim Protests | ARTINFO.com
HT - Sculptures Removed from Bangladesh Airport After Muslim Protests | Europe News
Read this then answer my question:Items like this are more common since Islam has become more activist and public; even in non-Muslim nations and areas of the world. QUESTION: Who determines the culture of a nation or what cultural traditions are important?Authorities in Bangladesh were forced to remove new sculptures installed at the international airport in the capital, Dhaka, after protests by Muslims threatening to destroy them, Agence France-Presse reports.
The five statues of local folk singers were created by Mrinal Haq, the country's best-known sculptor, for a government commission meant to enliven the dull Zia International airport. But thousands of Muslims came out to protest the sculptures, calling them idols and threatening to attack them with power tools (...)
It is behavior such as this by religious zealots that prompted the wisdom of our founders when it came to the separation of church and state (such as it is).
UPDATE: I've decided to attempt to post a listing of this offal whenever I find one -
- CENSORSHIP: Turk paper's web presence blocked by opposing Muslim view (h/t Europe News)
- COMMERCE: Sony delays PlayStation game over Qur'an [background] lyrics (h/t Europe News 10/20)
- ENTERTAINMENT: Muslim extremist's X Factor fury (h/t Europe News 10/20)
Saturday, September 27, 2008
PROPHETIC VOICE: Newsweek and Sam Harris gang up on Sarah, reveal end-time roll!
Sam Harris is a self-promoting, nobody atheist who has been blessed by the Peter Principle ... raised up to "his level of incompetence," only his benefactors have no idea he has been!Sam Harris on Sarah Palin and Elitism | Politics | Newsweek
HT - Newsweek on Palin: A 'Pet Pony' and 'Rapture-Ready Extremist' | NewsBusters
Writing in what used to be a worthy magazine, Harris declares John McCain's pick for Vice President a figment of imagination, a religious zealot of the first order, someone of such dysfunction that she is not worthy of our time, let alone our support.
So, I ask, why are Newsweek and the soon to be forgotten Sam Harris taking the time to mock her? The answer to that question is found in another Peter principle ...One of the dangers of keeping Sarah Palin under wraps is that it allows this kind of hyperbolic diatribe to reproduce! (see here also) Where is the danger for Harris' and his crapola, if he knows she won't be allowed to respond?Know this first of all, that in the last days mockers will come with their mocking, following after their own lusts, and saying, "Where is the promise of His coming?
For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all continues just as it was from the beginning of creation."
For when they maintain this, it escapes their notice that by the word of God the heavens existed long ago and the earth was formed out of water and by water, through which the world at that time was destroyed, being flooded with water. But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.2 Peter 3:3-10
I can't agree with all of Tim Graham's take on Harris' opinion of Palin because I don't see it in the same light ... with the same worldview!
Harris has a right to his opinion; it's the subtle and quasi-intellectual fear mongering (see cristophobia) which really bothers me (CRIB emphasis). Notice ...Her relative ignorance is guaranteed on these fronts and most others, not because she was put on the spot, or got nervous, or just happened to miss the newspaper on any given morning. Sarah Palin's ignorance is guaranteed because of how she has spent the past 44 years on earth.Excuse me? Who has Sam spent any quality time with regarding the "the past 44 years" of her life" Seriously, how does he know how she spent the past 44 years?
I care even more about the many things Palin thinks she knows but doesn't: like her conviction that the Biblical God consciously directs world events. Needless to say, she shares this belief with millions of Americans -- but we shouldn't be eager to give these people our nuclear codes, either.
Then there is this little slip: "her conviction that ... God ... directs world events." Add Harris' own admission "millions of Americans" share "this belief" with poor Sarah!
First, this has been shown and re-shown to have taken out of context. And, second, she never said or even implied anything near to this. But will Harris' hubris allow him to discuss it reasonably and rationally? No! It won't!
And "we" shouldn't? This wee slip of the tongue tells me that he believes he, the Newsweek shakers, and their mover-readers are all of one mind. Such arrogance!
And "these people"? What smug contempt for "millions of Americans"?
Harris and Newsweek are not just mocking Sarah Palin, they've called out, by Harris' own figures, millions of Americans. But they have no fear, not of Sarah's fellow Christians (recent history shows we don't fight back against this crapola) and not of the likes of Sam Harris or the editors of Newsweek (Romans 3:18).
Most reasonable people know intuitively what this means to the intelligentsia. And most public speakers/writers avoid it when speaking to or about any minority group: women, blacks, Jews, Muslims, etc. But not to Christians, especially Christian women.
Harris and Newsweek are both guilty of what they accuse Palin - of ignorance and of spending their lives in the wrong way, without God, and therefore not knowing him or what He has said!
CROSS POSTED: Cristophobia Watch
Saturday, September 20, 2008
RACISM: Let me get this straight - racist Democrats?
The teaser text in my FOXNews.com feed said, "Deep-seated misgivings about blacks among some Democrats could cost Obama the White House"!
Say what? Sum a dem Dems is racist? No! Can't be?Though that argument is countered by Obama’s strong primary performance is [sic] mostly white states like Iowa, the AP-Yahoo News survey, conducted with Stanford University, found one-third of white Democrats harbor negative views toward blacks — many calling them “lazy,” “violent” or responsible for their own troubles.That's right, Dems!
But it won't matter one whit, Republicans have already been warned that if the man from Illinois is not elected, it will be because of the GOP, conservatives, evangelicals, and people like Sarah Palin. (Did I miss anyone?) So the blame will be placed squarely on our shoulders no matter how he loses, period.Certainly, Republican John McCain has his own obstacles: He’s an ally of an unpopular president and would be the nation’s oldest first-term president. But Obama faces this: 40 percent of all white Americans hold at least a partly negative view toward blacks, and that includes many Democrats and independents.I certainly hope this survey is wrong, I don't like phobias in any form ... and I hate hate.
More than a third of all white Democrats and independents — voters Obama can’t win the White House without — agreed with at least one negative adjective about blacks, according to the survey, and they are significantly less likely to vote for Obama than those who don’t have such views.
Such numbers are a harsh dose of reality in a campaign for the history books. Obama, the first black candidate with a serious shot at the presidency, accepted the Democratic nomination on the 45th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech, a seminal moment for a nation that enshrined slavery in its Constitution.
Friday, September 12, 2008
CRISTOPHOBIA: Palin's religion dinigrated again!
CRISTOPHOBIA: Palin's religion denigrated again!
Implied in that phrase is a warning to listeners: WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO HEAR IS CLOUDED BY THE DANGEROUS TEACHINGS OF A THREAT TO GLOBAL SECURITY AND YOU AND YOUR FAMILY'S WELFARE!
Unless for ulterior reasons, it is unnecessary to highlight a candidate's religious convictions.
According to Barack Obama's own testimony he "is most definitely Christian." He said as much in his interview with Bill O'Reilly. And yet O'Reilly (to his credit) did not introduce him with the same appellation.
It is just as necessary that an atheist candidate not allow his personal spiritual convictions to adversely affect his political decisions and/or actions as it is for a Christian, Buddhist, or Mormon to not allow theirs to do so.
Very few authentic-Christians wear their faith on their sleeves; even fewer are publicly aggressive about their faith.
CROSS POSTED: Cristophobia Watch
Monday, September 01, 2008
PALIN: Will the real bigots please stand up?
J. Robert Smith speaks words of truth in his American Thinker piece ...The Coming Trials of Sarah Palin | American Thinker
HT - The Coming Trials of Sarah Palin | Black KettleDemocrats and the left generally can no more accept a Sarah Palin vice presidency than they could Clarence Thomas as a Supreme Court justice. They can no more accept a conservative woman a heartbeat away from the presidency than they can a conservative African-American interpreting the nation's laws. Expect the long knives to be out, and stay out.Since the Clarence Thomas nomination fight in 1991, conservatives and fair-minded Americans have learned a bitter lesson: for liberals, it isn't about promoting the advancement of all African-Americans, but only those in step with their ideology and aims. The same can be said of women. Liberals believe they own the franchise, and it doesn't allow for baby-making, gun-friendly, God-fearing women, who, not incidentally, fight for lower taxes, smaller government and a strong national defense. They certainly can't be Republicans.[...]Expect Democrats, the left and their allies in the establishment media to go well beyond the initial attacks on the Governor's inexperience and whatever they can pick out of her record. In the coming weeks, the left's whole political and media machine will seek not only to trip up the Governor to prove their contentions that she's dangerously inexperienced, but will attack her character. They'll especially go after her motherhood, her womanhood and her honesty.[...]And doesn't an attack on Palin's motherhood conflicting with her work life contradict longstanding feminist claims about women pursuing both? The answer is yes, but what does that matter? You expect logic and fairness? The left plays mercilessly for advantage. Contradictions are nuisances.Go there and read more of Smith's thoughts on feminism and Jolly Joe Biden.
Thursday, August 21, 2008
CRISTOPHOBIA: New blog launched!
SHEEP'S CRIB Ministries has launched a new blog - Cristophobia Watch.
We've become increasingly weary of the MSM, manifold bureaucrats, and twisted politicos proclaiming the persecution of this group and that individual while anti-Christian bias and bigotry takes place every hour of every day ... none of them seems to give a whit.
We realize there are anti-Cristophobia efforts alive and well throughout the world but none which treats Cristophobia news along the lines of Islamophobia Watch.
Click the link above and surf over to CW for yourself ... read especially the request for contributions and notifications.
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
CENSORSHIP: There is a difference!
UPDATE: FoxNews.com reports on the "self-censorship" and the cowardly ethics of Random House publishers, giving in to intimidation. How, I ask you, HOW can we combat an insidious evil if those around us run at every shadow and capitulate at every threat?
Click here to read Prologue to The Jewel of Medina.**** ****The only difference between the things which offend Muslims and the things which offend Christians is the potential.Muslims Offended Again. Publisher Takes “Firm Stand” | Brussels JournalSee also my earlier post and link ...
SHARIA: Arriving on your doorstep soon! | SHEEP'S CRIB - ISSUES
With Muslims you might get a riot or two with a few hundred burned cars, or perhaps a homicide bomber in one of your grocery stores or in the lobby of one of your police academies; with Christians you get thousands of emails, hundreds of letters, and dozens of phone calls, or perhaps you might get a line of pickets or a boycott.
This bigoted disparity seems to be missed by those who continue to produce material offensive to Christians: for TV {e.g., the visual trash known as Swingtown (on CBS) and Kath & Kim (on NBC}, for the theater (e.g., Sex and the City from New Line Cinema/TimeWarner), for the bookshelf (e.g., Brown's The Da Vinci Code or Hitchens' God Is Not Great) and for the public square (e.g., queer parades in Boston and San Francisco).
If you can find the time, count for me the number of deaths, the number of bombs, and the value of property damaged by Christians as a result of any of the above.
What troubles me is the aggravating absence of voices from the left, crying censorship. Clearly, if Christians so much as blink at something that is offensive to them, lefties flood the streets with deafening cries of censorship.
Mark my words, if and when Obama loses the 2008 presidential election, lefties in this country will raise a whirlwind of accusations about de facto racism, which is just another way of saying the whities of America censored their man due to his skin color.
It wouldn't occur to black-America that they in fact did censor John McCain because of his skin color.
Saturday, July 19, 2008
HOMOSEXUALS: LGBT - a gaggle of bullies!
HOMOSEXUALS: LGBT - a gaggle of bullies!
Though the people of California have voted their opinion of same-sex marriage more than once, those a little light in their loafers have risen from their soiled beds and thrown back the majority each time.
Apparently, finding cowards and co-conspirators among California's legislative and judicial elites is as easy as staging a leftist parade in Berkley without a permit.
But the tables were recently turned when the state's Supremes ruled an amendment to the constitution to declare marriage in California "between a man and a woman" could go forward on the November 4 ballot.
Not being able to take no for an answer, even since childhood, these middle-aged neo-hippies took up bullying as a means to their ends.
LGBT's inability to allow the majority to rule reminds me of what Antony Flew recently said of atheist Richard Dawkins: "they have become what they and their fellow secularists typically believe to be an impossibility: namely, secular bigots." [CRIB paraphrase]
Flew clarifies that his "copy of The Oxford Dictionary defines a bigot as ‘an obstinate or intolerant adherent of a point of view.’"
There is no question in my mind any longer, some of the biggest bigots in our culture today are gays, black activists, democrats, feminists, and liberals of every hue.
I find it offensive to the nth degree that the lucre-marinated, boycott obsessed, free speech spouting LGBT would object to Doug Manchester and others exercising their freedom to speak their convictions and spend their money as they see fit.
Thursday, August 02, 2007
REALITY: I don't think the world will ever be real again!
This is NOT a test! Tell me what do you see in the ad below? [UPDATE: Someone hacked the site that held the graphic below and replaced the ad with an ugly-green smiley face ... let me know in comments if it happens again.]
If you saw six Blacks bowing down to a White massa', your shorts are knotted and you need to get real; you've lost touch like most of your neighbors.
If you're a black and saw that, I don't think there's any hope for your conflicted, hate-filled, self-obsessed soul!
If you're a White Homey and agree with the Black's; I'd suggest you send your degrees back because you're overeducated and didn't learn anything worth retaining, they're meaningless ... you over-educated, sophomoric slob ... you are so blind from your pompous self-righteousness you're wholly useless to your fellow man!
If you saw a confusing ad from a high-tech giant that makes no sense to you because you're tech-challenged ... besides what the h__l do six swimmers or runners have to do with Intel anyway ... for you, I assume the last thing on your mind was writing a letter because your sensibilities were offended.
Intel pulled the ad, giving in to political correctness ... gawrrrrggggghhhhhhh!!!!!!! [Even though it's a lousy ad the pressure was assinine!]
Stockholders have executives and Boards of Directors to make their decisions - right or wrong! How can the investors hope for fiducial responsibility from a rabble that drinks from the cesspool of popular opinion.
Here's why Intel caved!According to Snopes' Urban Legends page:The intent of the ad was to emphasize the ability of Intel's Core 2 Duo Processors to "boost productivity and efficiency by running multiple computing-intensive applications at once" through the visual imagery of presenting a team of (identical) sprinters down in set positions, ready to take off and blaze their way through the office environment while a pleased IT Manager stands amidst them bearing a look of confidence and satisfaction.We're all living a surreal lala land! God please help us?
Unfortunately, more than a few viewers saw something quite different in that imagery: a group of dark-skinned men bowing down in subservience to a smug, light-skinned overseer. The ad created enough of a controversy that Intel pulled it from the publications in which it was scheduled to appear, and Intel's vice president of Sales and Marketing issued a public apology on behalf of the company ...
Now if you'd like to know how I really feel, stay tuned!
BLOGGERS BLOGGING:Road Before Us
Ruminations
Friday, July 20, 2007
ANTI-SEMITISM: A Sin-disease With No Rational Whatsoever!
After all the senseless anti-semitic evil Europe has seen in the past three or four centuries, I'm dumbfounded that it apparently continues relatively unabated. FoxNews reports ...That there might be one act of antisemitism in a nation of 60 million is to be statistically understood; but frequent acts in a "civil" society is unthinkable and inexcusable.The number of anti-Semitic incidents in Britain increased by 34 percent last year, according to records collected by the Community Security Trust, a charity that monitors antisemitism in Britain and is regularly cited in government reports for being more comprehensive than police data.
That was the biggest annual increase since 1984, when the charity began collecting figures. Based on current projections, the number of incidents this year is on track to equal last year's.According to a poll in the London Times in December 2005, 37 percent of Britain's 2 million Muslims agreed that all 268,000 members of the Jewish community were legitimate targets because of Israel's policies.No question the seed of Isaac and the seed of Ismael have a history; but ask yourself what you would think if in a poll by the London Times 37 percent of Britain's 268,000 Jews agreed that all 2 million Muslims "were legitimate targets because of Islam's policies"? Or even 15%?
There would be an outcry only exceeded in history by a volcanic eruption of Krakatoa's magnitude.The names have changed but the faces and the worldviews are the same!"Bigots try to make all Jews responsible for the actions of the only democratically elected government in the Middle East," John Mann, a member of Parliament, told FOXNews.com.
"Anti-Israeli sentiment does go over the line to Antisemitism," said Mann, who chaired a bipartisan committee that studied antisemitism in Britain.
Israel-bashing has been fueled in Britain by militant left-wing trade unionists, academics and some members of the British press who regard Israel as an apartheid state determined to eliminate the Palestinians.
BLOGGERS BLOGGING:Days of Noah
Exposing BBC Bias
Fundamentals of Falsehood
Lynn Suzanne
Members of the Tribe
Noisy Room
Powerline Forum
YID with LID
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
