Showing posts with label Worldviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Worldviews. Show all posts

Friday, April 03, 2009

BOOK REVIEW: The Rose Conspiracy; Craig Parshall, Harvest House, 2009

"Please don't let this case get to the death-penalty phase. Do that for me, will you?"
Antagonist to her Protagonist attorney
I evaluate books on the basis of our worldviews; clearly we select our reading material on that basis. The following are ten worldview factors considered relevant to an objective review of The Rose Conspiracy:
Moral Offense/Personal factor: very low
Agenda/Worldview factor: high/religious
Readability factor: high
Interest/Attention factor: high - slow to start but ultimately high
Fog/Confusion factor: low
Historical factor (if applicable): strong
Educational factor (if applicable): medium to strong
Novelty factor: high
Finish factor: medium
Overall Rating: On a scale of one to ten - an eight point five; if you're not a history fan, or you're an anti-religion zealot, you may not see it my way ... but, then, I don't really care!

See below for the key to these factors.

OVERVIEW

According to Harvest House, the publisher ...
Parshall takes his readers to the nation’s capital, where a hitherto unknown [John Wilkes Booth] document has turned up...and turned into murder.

As the Smithsonian’s president examines a newly discovered account of Abraham Lincoln’s assassination, an intruder steals in, kills him, and disappears into the night with the document.

Vinnie Archmont, an accomplished and stunningly beautiful artist, is implicated. She hires the brilliant but secretly guilt–burdened criminal law professor J.D. Blackstone.

Blackstone finds himself uncovering the Mystic Freemasons’ most guarded secret. He reluctantly turns to his uncle, a Bible–quoting Anglican priest and occult–religions expert. Enemies like a sorcery–obsessed billionaire English lord, a powerful U.S. Senator, and a ruthless prosecutor force Blackstone to employ all his cunning.

In the process, he is compelled to choose between
[the] spiritual counterfeit and [what is presented as] Gospel truth, [between] guilt and forgiveness ... [as well as between] destruction and a new beginning.
Parenthetical inserts are The CRIB's clarifications.
Overall I enjoyed the read; though not as engrossing as I prefer, it was a pleasant read and not a waste of time as so many are after you've read a couple thousand books in your lifetime; by that I mean the author overcame my overread prejudices.

Those prejudices tended to make the characters and plot somewhat predictable and, in many ways, poorly developed. However, after finishing the book and looking back, I see this criticism as relatively undeserved.

The intent of the author and the publisher was to present a Judeo-Christian wo
rldview in the context of an historical setting. Did they accomplish that? I would answer that with a qualified yes. Simply put "I am not ashamed of the Gospel of Jesus Christ" and so I would have preferred a frontal assault on the subject.

By chapter 46 a subtle Judeo-Christian witness picks up and becomes quite well conceived and presented.

At at least one point (about Ch. 28) the reading slowed to a crawl and at another point (about Ch. 37) I began to feel like there were too many cliches being thrown in ... however, in both cases the distraction brief.

As a big fan of historical fiction, I would have enjoyed a greater development of the Lincoln assassination and the plethora of Civil War connections. But on the whole the work did not suffer from their absence.

I would recommend this book to any reader; especially those who enjoy criminal or historical fiction, specifically those with a Judeo-Christian worldview.
AUTHOR
Craig Parshall is Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the National Religious Broadcasters Association, and the author of six legal–suspense novels: the five books in the Chambers of Justice series, and the stand–alone Trial by Ordeal. He speaks nationally on legal and Christian worldview issues and is a magazine columnist. He has coauthored five books with his wife, Janet, including the historical novels Crown of Fire and Captives and Kings.
DISCLAIMER
I am not an employee of Harvest House Publishers, nor am I associated with them or the author; additionally, I've received no compensation for this review; the book was provided to me at no cost for the purpose of review by Active Christian Media.

FACTOR KEY
Moral Offense/Personal: did the author include material I found personally or morally offensive?
Agenda/Worldview: did the author use his work to push an agenda or personal worldview?
Readability: how did the text flow; did I have to stop and go back? A little or lots?
Interest/Attention: Was I grabbed early on and held there to the end?
Fog/Confusion: did the author write more than needed? was his style or plot line confusing? did I feel uncertain about where the author was going at any time?
Historical: Since I read lots of historical stuff, were there a lots of historical goodies for me to munch on as I read? (Note: full coarse meals earn "very high" ratings)
Educational: did I learn anything I did not already know or had forgotten?
Novelty: did the author present novel approaches in his plot and people?
Finish: did the author leave me hanging? did I feel cheated after sacrificing my valuable time to read his stupid book? In other words, did he finish his effort in a valiant way?
Overall Rating: the author's final grade; a one is an "F", a five is a "C", and a ten is an "A."

Thursday, December 11, 2008

FAITH: Ephemeral links by their common ancestry!

The CRIB's periodically fugacious concerning people and events of faith ...
  • NAE in hot water again ... this time for an NAE executive's personal views concerning traditional values (abortion, gay marriage) as they relate to elections and candidate qualifications. [Christian Post] UPDATE: Exec resigns.

  • EUTHANASIA: American retires to UK in order to go to Switzerland to end his suffering now a docu-celeb! I don't begrudge him his choice but it doesn't change who gives and takes life (Deuteronomy 32:39). [Sky News; h/t FOXNews]

  • If you are a regular at The CRIB you may have noticed there's no ephemeral category for "Sports." That's because we stopped being a fan when athlete felonies exceeded hail-marys.

    But then I didn't know about this ... awesome! I'd love to attend! Nothing better than a squad of God's men singing His praises!
    [Christian Post]

  • Yea, and we have the "right" to be self-indulgent fools as well, I guess! [FOX News]

  • Lisa Miller in her Newsweek cover story offers an excellent example of what happens when you buy into the teachings of liberal theologians. Speaking out of the natural man rather than the supernatural man, rather than change her worldview to accommodate His message, Miller redacts His text in order to fit her message. [Newsweek; h/t News Busters (related: Is Newsweek's Meacham challenging religious America?)]

  • This is the reason I'm more forgiving of Bush 43's record concerning issues of faith over the past 8 years ... he simply doesn't know any better! [FOX News]

  • The Cardinal, the Madonna, and the Dictator (or more relevantly - the apostate, the sinner, and the oppressor) ... definitely a sign of the times! [Yahoo! News]

Saturday, October 25, 2008

OPINION: Ignore your base in politics at your own peril!


In the same way Michael Malone is ashamed of his present association with Journalism [h/t News Busters], I'm ashamed of my present association with and support of another major American institution ... the GOP and its Neo-cons!
GOP Shackled
Like the Russian Roulette player who thought you had to remove one bullet rather than the other five, the shakers and movers of the Grand Ole Party of the Republic have managed to blow their brains out, but haven't a clue why.

The situation the conservative base now finds itself in (an impending Super Majority) should never have happened. These idiots went into government service to change politics and instead were themselves changed by it.

As Limbaugh continues to remind us, Reagan was and is revered because he appealed to the conservative base across all party lines, races, politics, ethnicities, religions, and cultures. And he did it lightheartedly and with a spring in his step and a smile on his face. The Gipper was and is the personification of an ideal that appeals to all conservative Americans.

The reason the liberals in America are winning is that their leadership, unlike ours, know their base and appeal to it -
60s radicals, socialists, middle-aged flower-children, neo-commies, victims of "the system," black-racists, relativists, iconoclasts, cultural demagogs, closet anarchists, anti-American Americans, east and west coast snobs and elitists, the MSM, protesters, rebels, the unemployed and unemployable, immigrants, ethnic minorities, entitlists, the uneducated, the ill-informed, the ignorant, druggies, unions and union workers, special interest groups, and anyone who is willing to sell his soul and his country for a price.
Barack Obama is a perfect fit for the liberal base; John McCain was and is not even a modest fit for the conservative base ... it's a shame Sarah Palin is not at the head of the ticket. If the MSM and the federal super majority in DC do not fix it so she can't, I will support her for the conservative ticket till hell freezes over in four years, if she runs.

It's going to be a long four years, a sloggingly long four years. God help us!

It is a sad time in a once great nation, and many are beginning to come to that realization.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

JESUS: A Community Organizer and a racist!

For you always have the poor with you; but you do not always have Me.

Matthew 26:11
Using the current DNC Dictionary for Contemporary Political Dialog by Saul Alinsky we now know that Jesus was not only a community organizer but a bigoted racist as well, indifferent to the plight of the poor.

PATRIOTISM: Quote of the day!

PATRIOTISM: Quote of the day!

George Neumayr, writing in The American Spectator, offers this timely gem of truth ...
Patriotism is now measured not by respect for the conservatism contained in the Declaration of Independence and Constitution but by the level of one's enthusiasm for the America to come.
That America is a fearful proposition for some of us.


Saturday, October 18, 2008

OBAMA: Is our election of a president a popularity contest or prophetic precursor?


The world is being set up; set up to one day receive the biblical "man of lawlessness." In August I posted ...
The CRIB is NOT saying anything about Obama being the Antichrist, far too many things must come first ... the Temple, the priesthood, the ten nation confederacy, and the return of the Jewish diaspora ... only be aware, be on the alert ... for the days are short.
In that post I quoted 2 Thessalonians 2:3-5, where Scripture warns us of a day when he will be made known ... it's a certainty. The CRIB simply wants to warn its readers to be on the alert ... these are prophetic times.

Some generation will be alive when he is revealed; our generation is being used to set the stage for that revelation. The global community (this generation), because of its godlessness and weariness, is being hypnotized into acting as a precursor for his actual coming.

Three unrelated yet relevant news articles caught my attention ... and they should catch yours.
"I want you to believe," said the candidate, clad in an open-necked shirt and barn jacket. "Not so much believe just in me but believe in yourselves. Believe in the future. Believe in the future we can build together. I'm confident together we can't fail."

There was a carnival atmosphere among the crowd of some 4,000, who almost drowned Mr Obama out as he reached his crescendo and said: "I promise you. We won't just win New Hampshire. We will win this election and, you and I together, we're going to change the country and change the world."
[Telegraph UK]
Jesus Himself said, "Apart from me you can do nothing." How is it that this candidate never mentions Jesus if he is such a staunch believer.
The Economist has organized a global consultative participation via the internet in the US‘ election. The available results give “99%” of the countries to Obama. While the sample is not scientific – only those with access to the weekly and the internet could participate – one thing is clear.

Never has anyone in superpower America ascended to power with as much global support as BO is likely to. The disappointment of the sobered at home and abroad will match the present enthusiasm fueled by illusions.
[Brussels Journal]
Almost sounds biblical, doesn't it? That's what I thought. We are being used by God to set the stage ... I'm certain of it!
Friday's NBC Nightly News devoted a story to how around the world “people want to turn a page on the Bush years” and, as if it's relevant, “if the world had a vote, Barack Obama would win in a landslide.” A suggestion to viewers on what they must do to restore America's honor?

Reporter Dawna Friesen warned that the next President “faces a grim reality: Much of the world deeply distrusts, even dislikes, the United States” and she rued “much of the sympathy and solidarity that existed after 9/11 evaporated during the Bush years.”
[News Busters]
I too want to turn a page on the Bush years, but I don't want the world to have anything to do with selecting our president. In fact, I only cede that to God.
Here in Turkey, as in much of the world, people want to turn a page on the Bush years. In fact, polls show the image of the U.S. has improved slightly this year simply because President Bush is leaving. And, that if the world had a vote, Barack Obama would win in a landslide. Regardless of who wins, the world is clamoring for a new America in 2009. [Friesen - NBC Nightly News via News Busters]
Clearly, in my opinion, this generation is being used to precursor the coming of the Antichrist. Not a generation which follows this one will be immune from the subtle pull of Satan's grip and Antichrist's power sapping undercurrent.

God have mercy on me a sinner, and show us your Light, your True Light.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

MUSLIMS: Who will decide the culture and traditions of your land?


Read this then answer my question:
Idols or art? Bangladesh Airport Muslim ProtestAuthorities in Bangladesh were forced to remove new sculptures installed at the international airport in the capital, Dhaka, after protests by Muslims threatening to destroy them, Agence France-Presse reports.

The five statues of local folk singers were created by Mrinal Haq, the country's best-known sculptor, for a government commission meant to enliven the dull Zia International airport. But thousands of Muslims came out to protest the sculptures, calling them idols and threatening to attack them with power tools (...)
Items like this are more common since Islam has become more activist and public; even in non-Muslim nations and areas of the world. QUESTION: Who determines the culture of a nation or what cultural traditions are important?

It is behavior such as this by religious zealots that prompted the wisdom of our founders when it came to the separation of church and state (such as it is).

UPDATE: I've decided to attempt to post a listing of this offal whenever I find one -
  1. CENSORSHIP: Turk paper's web presence blocked by opposing Muslim view (h/t Europe News)
  2. COMMERCE: Sony delays PlayStation game over Qur'an [background] lyrics (h/t Europe News 10/20)
  3. ENTERTAINMENT: Muslim extremist's X Factor fury (h/t Europe News 10/20)


Wednesday, October 15, 2008

PALIN: An open letter of apology from a fellow American!


Dear Sarah -

Over the past few weeks, my heart has been repeatedly broken for you and your family as I've witnessed the most caustic, imbalanced, ill-tempered, unreasonable, biased, unjustifiable, hypo-vitriolic, and satanic personal attacks to have ever been foisted on a public figure in my lifetime, and perhaps in the history of this country.

Miss Personality 2008On behalf of roughly half of the adult American population, I apologize for the treatment you and your family have endured from the other half of our adult population; most significantly from our Main Stream Media (MSM), but also from Europeans, the democrats, the entertainment industry, the far left, feminists, and a group I can only describe as a mass of secular and ignorant.

Their irrational portrayals, stereotypical characterizations (or rather mischaracterizations), duplicitous fabrications, immoral labeling, insensitive slurs, and carnal propaganda must hurt you all during your precious family times.

For all of this, to the limits of my freedom to do so, I apologize. Shame on us all.

Since my elder sister had the pleasure of meeting you and your family in passing, and because she said you all are exactly what you seem to be, I know you have the grace and spirit to forgive and move on. God bless you and the rest of the Palin clan ... especially God's special gift, Trig.

John Gillmartin
The SHEEP'S CRIB

Sunday, October 12, 2008

EUROPEAN CONNECTION: Don't fence me in ... I'm religious and political?


America is going the way of Europe ...
unbeknown to the majority of her citizens!

John Steinbeck's novella was titled - Of Mice and Men; but God said - of neither mice nor men ...
Know this first of all, that in the last days mockers will come with their mocking, following after their own lusts, and saying, "Where is the promise of His coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all continues just as it was from the beginning of creation." For when they maintain this, it escapes their notice that by the word of God the heavens existed long ago and the earth was formed out of water and by water, through which the world at that time was destroyed, being flooded with water.

But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men. But do not let this one fact escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day. The Lord is not slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, in which the heavens will pass away with a roar and the elements will be destroyed with intense heat, and the earth and its works will be burned up.

2 Peter 3:3-10
But first a metaphorical interlude ...
Farmer Jones was content with his life's work: his terraced fields were solid and easily maintained; his dual-source irrigation system was state of the art; his stock fine and deep in DNA; his bio-seed stores unrivaled; and his children and grandchildren legally provided for ... a century at least if the wisdom they were taught ruled their lives.

But his neighbor was not so content, nor so wise: when the 100 year flood came, it took his poorly built terraces, polluted his wells, killed his stock, saturated his seed stores, and took the house and barns as a final thought. On their way to removing the new county road, the waters and the flotsam and jetsam undermined Jones' terraces and took his farm too!
Though the global financial crisis is the easiest correlation here, the demise of Europe as a viable Western ally will cascade across the sea and destroy all that is not destroyed by the fiduciary failure of our financial community.

So how is it that I see America following Europe's lead in to oblivion?

First, Europe's new leaders believe they can correct "mistakes" of the past (Crusades, wars, poverty, inhumanity, etc.) by ignoring almost 1,500 years of Christian influence.
Papal mutterings about this perceived "apostasy" have been increasing in volume for some time now - but what really infuriated the Vatican was the presentation, back in 2003, of the first draft of the ill-fated European constitution.

In its preamble, the authors had indulged themselves in a spot of root-tracing. Europe's debt to ancient Greece and Rome was solemnly acknowledged. So, too, were the achievements of the Enlightenment. About the Christian roots of European civilisation, however, there was nothing.

The implication was obvious: everything between Marcus Aurelius and Voltaire was to be reckoned mere backwardness and superstition. [...]

Today's secular Europe may well pride itself on having arrived at a post-religious state of moral and intellectual superiority - but it is no less Christendom's heir for that.
In the USA it is a popular recreation, and Starbucks' moment, to wax on about our evil and religious past, while revealing a severe case of anti-religious ignorance marinated in an unhealthy canister of secular arrogance; in so doing the secular humanist, not seeing the baby in the dirty water, throws it out.

What they conveniently forget in their snobbery is the existence of such grand institutions as Harvard, Princeton, Dartmouth, Notre Dame, Loyola; the multiple and nationwide hospitals of the Methodists, Baptists, Presbyterians, Catholics, the benevolent work of the Amish, Mennonites, the Salvation Army, the Knights of Columbus, and the senior care and retirement facilities of manifold others, etc. and etc.

All undeniable foundational and historically relevant religious entities.

Second, Europe's new leaders believe they can get away with the former if they "ring-fence" all religions and politics.
... the con viction [sic] that the religious and political spheres should be rigorously ring-fenced - and even more rigorously patrolled - has widespread support in Brussels. As one group of MEPs protested, in an official letter of complaint to the president of the European Parliament: "The EU is of a secular and neutral nature."
Almost daily, in America, someone (usually a politician but also an entertainer or academician), somewhere stands to condemn all things religious, throwing the baby, the water, and the clean out together.

A good example of this attitude of the left is the fairness doctrine (it's believed by some that this abomination will be reinstated in the event of an Obama victory); this is nothing more than cristophobia in drag.

Third, Europe's new leaders believe there are no absolutes and are willing to institute a broad set of absolutes to stop belief in them.
Pope Benedict asked last year: ‘Is it not surprising that today's Europe, while hoping to be seen as a community of values, more and more seems to contest that universal and absolute values exist?’

Yet he ought to have made it clear that the EU has developed its own universal and absolute articles of faith which are not neutral, but decidedly anti.

If a state seeks to be neutral in the effect of its policies then it requires a greater level of state intervention to ensure that inequalities are negated.
[Cranmer]
A refreshing wind in all of this elitist duplicity and stupidity is Benedict XVI's adamant stand against the EU Parliament's efforts to bury their heads in the sand.

Most of our (America's) cultural war has been fought on this battlefield ... sanctity of human life, separation of church and state, Constitutional law and legislating from the bench, capital punishment, free speech, etc.
Cranmer is with Pope Benedict XVI in his opposition to the EU’s militant secularism.

One cannot be ‘neutral’ in matters of religion - pretending to broker between ‘equal’ faiths and impartial in arbitration between competing worldviews - for that neutrality presupposes a higher level of knowledge and constitutes itself an article of faith. There is no neutrality to be had because neutrality needs as much justification as any other position.
Secular humanism has progressively become more absolutist in its quest to silence conservatives and people of faith by ridiculing the belief in absolutes ... and the irony seems to be lost on them.

Fourth, multiculturalism has been the weapon of choice for Europe and the European Union ... a weapon incapable of aiding in a suicide ... for combating the Third Jihad.
With Wall Street convulsing, and the White House race intensifying, the question "Who lost Europe" is on no one's lips, let alone minds. Indeed, the question begs another: "Is Europe lost?"

The answer to the second question is, "No, not yet." And losing Europe, I would add, is by no means inevitable. But that doesn't mean the continent isn't currently hell-bent to accommodate the dictates of Islamic law, bit by increasingly larger bit. Such a course of accommodation, barring reversal, will only hasten Bernard Lewis' famous prediction that Europe will be Islamic by century's end.
[Diana West]
The USA has been duped into a multicultural stupor by leftists and special interest groups; Islamic groups have used this stupor to their advantage. If America doesn't wake up, it will have more than an illegal immigration problem.
The west faces increasing tension with the Muslim world. [...]

As the first decade of the third Christian millennium draws to an increasingly troubled close, the verdict of historians on its significance can already be anticipated. Two themes will predominate. The first, exemplified by the present carnage in the financial markets, will be the quickening of the west's decline relative to China and India; the second, not entirely coincidentally, will be the tensions in the relationship between the west and the Muslim world.
A bleak picture indeed ... for a nation so self-absorbed and carnal that it might well face a day not too distant when it cannot defend itself. A nation's military security is intrinsically tied to its economic security ... and as we found when Russia invaded Georgia, we're lacking in both areas.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

WEALTH: A prelude to the Last Days!

Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys, and where thieves do not break in or steal; for where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.
Matthew 6:19-21
Scripture warns of days like these ... man, vested in this world and not the next, is surprised by the loss of all his wealth, having come to trust in it.

Who is there to blame ... point the finger of blame anywhere but in a mirror! Whose watch is it? Blame him! Or, though they know not God, they blame God!

I have come to believe this financial crisis is being allowed by God, much as He allowed the Tower of Babel to be built. When He tired of man's efforts to reach Him He threw them into global confusion, much like the global confusion we witness today.

And the fact that neither of the two candidates for POTUS are truly acceptable candidates, that neither is qualified to lead in these days of trial and tribulation; neither is like David, a man after God's own heart.

It is so like God to humble the wisdom of man by His ignorance, man's power by His weakness, and man's message by the message!

Wars are being fought that cannot be won (and here); nonsensical ideologies are waxing strong (Soviet resurgence; Amadinajab's nuclear & Israeli foreign policy), while the wisdom of the ages gathers dust on the book shelf; and public ignorance grows like mold under a leaky sink.
Yet still the panic continues, still the stock markets suffer record-breaking falls, still the finance ministers and central bank governors scratch their heads to cobble together yet another initiative to avert financial cataclysm.

And millions of helpless people are left to wander aimlessly in a valley of darkness and insecurity, because they followed their leaders without discernment; they trusted their teachings and respected their learning; they affirmed their experience and submitted to their authority.

Yet all the time those leaders were leading the people astray, for they were placating them with falsehood and lies, leading them to the false god of riches and avarice. They fixed their eyes on the Gold Calf, in worship, love and adoration. And the people mistook this idol for the God of their forefathers, for it brought happiness, material wealth, security, and the people had never had it so good.

But all good things must come to an end, especially those good things which were not actually good, but merely seemed so.
Or so says His Grace, the Archbishop Cranmer. Here, here! Or is it, "Hear, hear"?

Monday, October 06, 2008

AYERS CONNECTION: You are known by the company you keep!


[Courtesy of - The Real Barrack Obama]

The Apostle Paul warned, "Do not be deceived: 'Bad company corrupts good morals.'" (1 Corinthians 15:33)

Or as "five feet of fury" says, There's nothing wrong with "guilt by association" if the person you're associating with is guilty of something... The McCain campaign needs to spin the Ayers connection much better."
It's about the fact that Ayers went from domestic terrorist to "respected community leader", to the point where Ayers was throwing well attended fundraisers for Obama, and they sat on boards together. [fff]
The 60s have spawned a lot of stuff but the Ayers-Dohrn-Obama connection may well be one of the most pernicious and dangerous!
... that means Obama isn't a decent, intelligent person. Period. He's just another craven, arrogant, Chicago style politician. [fff]
How can anyone say that! We can because Obama is guilty by association! No amount of spin, no amount of condemnation, no amount of denial is going to eradicate the fact that he associated with know domestic terrorists and leftist, anti-American idealists.

Not once but on numerous occasions; not just one of the above but numerous individuals.
What does it tell you about Obama and his policies and his worldview that people like Ayers and his ilk are obviously going to vote for the guy? [fff]
It tells us they know something the American people need to know! Regardless of whether McCain-Palin achieve the White House, the American people have a right to know the truth about a possible wolf in sheep's clothing.

Critics of the McCain-Palin camp (for making this an issue) demand evidence; they say if it's true why isn't the MSM all over this? The easy answer goes without saying. But ...
No evidence? Well, Stanley Kurtz and Steve Diamond, two of the only journalists actually interested enough to look into the relationship, would beg to differ about the extent of Obama’s relationship with Ayers ... [David Thompson]
Bottom-line, it doesn't matter whose feelings or sensibilities are tweaked; what matters is informing the American people regardless of where the votes fall.

And below that bottom-line is the question of Obama's twenty year association with the very wrong Rev. Wright ... he's fair game.

Why McCain waited for a hail-Mary moment is a mystery to all.

David Thompson wonders ...
... what the precise level of ostracism should be for those, like Ayers, who show no contrition for past sins. But I find it remarkable that so little stigma is apparent. There is a double standard here, whereby leftwing extremism, even of the most contemptible kind, is excused as some youthful exuberance or badge of credibility.
But can the same be said for rightwing extremism? Say a Todd Palin-David Duke connection from twenty years ago? Would the press excuse that?

Sunday, October 05, 2008

PALIN: A few well placed notes do not make music!


Bird Dog at Maggie's Farm sure sums up a lot of our feelings (link above) ... especially his link to Jungle Trader's link to Michael Goodwin's thoughts at the New York Daily News.
"Some day, we will look back with disgust at the abuse Palin has taken and wonder how it could happen in this great nation, circa 2008."
My short answer is that far too many Americans are fundamentally selfish, self-centered, ego-centrists.

BAILOUT: First California, now Massachusetts! Two of the bluest states in Union!


Did anyone know that this socialist, anti-capitalism program, called a "bailout, (which is really a buyout, which is really a screw up) was to be used to bolster Democratic states in the midst of an election cycle?

Neither did I! Welcome to Paulson's bridge to nowhere!

I was told it was for the credit market! I was told it was for Main Street! Now it's to be used to pay for entitlement programs in "blue" states with socialist legislatures, who redistribute wealth through government largess!

Oh the milking of the public cow ... it feels soooooooooooooooooooooooo good!

Who will be next! Pick the bluest states with the biggest and most liberal socialist programs and there you will find the federal spicket and your hard earned dollars flowing to their empty coffers!

ScrewedWhy? Because the system wants to forcibly violate you; this system run by the very liberals who got us into this mess in the first place.

Why? Because they can't violate their own citizens any more, so they've come for you!

Now that captialism has been mugged you can expect more! Buck up me hearty, you are an American taxpayer, it is your "patriotic" duty to pay through the ying yang!

Saturday, October 04, 2008

FEMINISTS: One-eyed theology coming your way soon!

You sex goddesses! You hussies! You Jezzabels! Trying to turn our heads with that other eye! Shame! I say, SHAME!!!! We won't be satisfied until we cover the other eye!

Those of you who see Islam as just a cultural phenomena consider the recommendations of this man of Islamic orthodoxy. Europe is soon to to be a Muslim wasteland; this is what the complicitors can expect for their sisters and daughters. And this is just one of many of Saudi Arabia's dysfunctional exports!
A Muslim cleric in Saudi Arabia has called on women to wear a full veil, or niqab, that reveals only one eye.

Sheikh Muhammad al-Habadan said showing both eyes encouraged women to use eye make-up to look seductive.
Seems to this strong-willed male - seduction is as seductions sees! My guess is that the Sheikh has a self-control problem and so he takes it out on the girls because he's not man enough to go to rehab!

Check his hard drive!

Friday, October 03, 2008

DEBATE: Three ladies were big winners last night!

There were three winners in last night's debate: Lady Liberty, Gwen Ifill, and Sarah Palin! Not all agree, however.

America is a winner because her people are being remembered. Ifill is a winner because she was professional to a fault ... kudos to her! And Palin, well I'll let Noonan speak for me!

Rebecca Bynum, at NER, is on the side of Biden ...

I thought Palin was much too rehearsed ... she shaded the truth ... without really understanding the reality of the situation ... .

This was especially blatant concerning her characterization of Biden's position on Iraq which has been basically consistent. ... Bad marks there. ... I do remember his basic assessment was much more realistic than the rosey picture we got from the administration.

Moreover, Joe Biden ... actually succeeded in making himself seem more human, especially when he almost broke down referring to a child who had died. This in turn, made Palin's strategy of sticking to policy talking points seem shallow.

Palin made good points on energy policy, but outside that issue, she was a bit out of her depth. [...]

Biden said an Obama adminstration would "end the war in Iraq." If only I could believe him. [...]

Palin exceeded expectations, but I'm afraid when all is said and done, the debate went to Biden.
Another NER contributor, Hugh Fitzgerald, was favorable to Palin but recognizes reality for what it is ...
[...] One of them was pretty.

This part of the pick hardly matters. The choice is between McCain ... and Obama .... And there is also the question of effectiveness. Who has a record that suggests he will be better able to persuade or force the recalcitrant in Congress -... to do what he thinks, or claims, must be done? This matters, for the consequences of both global warming, and the world-wide Jihad -- like time and tide -- wait for no man.
Bynum, to her credit, recognizes this in a comment to the latter's post ...
Yes indeed, it is McCain who will be able to "reach across the aisle in a bi-partisan way" and enact...comprehensive immigration reform. Neither one will get us out of Iraq and either one is likely to get us further bogged down in Afghanistan.

We're doomed, doomed.
I don't share that level of pessimism.

Thursday, October 02, 2008

MCCAIN-PALIN: What is this election all about?

Someone please tell me what the Democrats/Leftists/Liberals think this election is all about? If the truth be known about every candidate for office we'd not have any candidates by this standard!



The ad asks - "Do we really want a vice president who sanctions such savagery?"

On the other hand, do we want a VP who plagiarizes, lies, and refuses to admit his party's complicity in the current economic debacle?

Of course not, but that is apparently what about 50% of Americans believe they want!

Monday, September 29, 2008

Saturday, September 27, 2008

PROPHETIC VOICE: Newsweek and Sam Harris gang up on Sarah, reveal end-time roll!

Sam Harris is a self-promoting, nobody atheist who has been blessed by the Peter Principle ... raised up to "his level of incompetence," only his benefactors have no idea he has been!

Writing in what used to be a worthy magazine, Harris declares John McCain's pick for Vice President a figment of imagination, a religious zealot of the first order, someone of such dysfunction that she is not worthy of our time, let alone our support.

So, I ask, why are Newsweek and the soon to be forgotten Sam Harris taking the time to mock her? The answer to that question is found in another Peter principle ...
Know this first of all, that in the last days mockers will come with their mocking, following after their own lusts, and saying, "Where is the promise of His coming?

For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all continues just as it was from the beginning of creation."

For when they maintain this, it escapes their notice that by the word of God the heavens existed long ago and the earth was formed out of water and by water, through which the world at that time was destroyed, being flooded with water. But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.

2 Peter 3:3-10
One of the dangers of keeping Sarah Palin under wraps is that it allows this kind of hyperbolic diatribe to reproduce! (see here also) Where is the danger for Harris' and his crapola, if he knows she won't be allowed to respond?

I can't agree with all of Tim Graham's take on Harris' opinion of Palin because I don't see it in the same light ... with the same worldview!

Harris has a right to his opinion; it's the subtle and quasi-intellectual fear mongering (see cristophobia) which really bothers me (CRIB emphasis). Notice ...
Her relative ignorance is guaranteed on these fronts and most others, not because she was put on the spot, or got nervous, or just happened to miss the newspaper on any given morning. Sarah Palin's ignorance is guaranteed because of how she has spent the past 44 years on earth.

I care even more about the many things Palin thinks she knows but doesn't: like her conviction that the Biblical God consciously directs world events. Needless to say, she shares this belief with millions of Americans -- but we shouldn't be eager to give these people our nuclear codes, either.
Excuse me? Who has Sam spent any quality time with regarding the "the past 44 years" of her life" Seriously, how does he know how she spent the past 44 years?

Then there is this little slip: "her conviction that ... God ... directs world events." Add Harris' own admission "millions of Americans" share "this belief" with poor Sarah!

First, this has been shown and re-shown to have taken out of context. And, second, she never said or even implied anything near to this. But will Harris' hubris allow him to discuss it reasonably and rationally? No! It won't!

And "we" shouldn't? This wee slip of the tongue tells me that he believes he, the Newsweek shakers, and their mover-readers are all of one mind. Such arrogance!

And "these people"? What smug contempt for "millions of Americans"?

Harris and Newsweek are not just mocking Sarah Palin, they've called out, by Harris' own figures, millions of Americans. But they have no fear, not of Sarah's fellow Christians (recent history shows we don't fight back against this crapola) and not of the likes of Sam Harris or the editors of Newsweek (Romans 3:18).

Most reasonable people know intuitively what this means to the intelligentsia. And most public speakers/writers avoid it when speaking to or about any minority group: women, blacks, Jews, Muslims, etc. But not to Christians, especially Christian women.

Harris and Newsweek are both guilty of what they accuse Palin - of ignorance and of spending their lives in the wrong way, without God, and therefore not knowing him or what He has said!

CROSS POSTED: Cristophobia Watch

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

RACISM: The real racists are no longer white!

Blacks can spin it anyway they want but the arrow still points squarely at racists! Writing for RCP, Dennis Pragar says ...
Seven weeks before the 2008 presidential election, liberals are warning America that if Barack Obama loses, it is because Americans are racist. ....

That an Obama loss will be due to racism is becoming as normative a liberal belief as "Bush Lied, People Died," a belief that has generated intense rage among many liberals.
The double standard on who is and who is not a racist cannot hide the overwhelming percentage of blacks voting for Obama just because he is black.
The deep emotional connection that nearly every black American has to an Obama victory is difficult for even empathetic non-blacks to measure. A major evangelical pastor told me that even evangelical black pastors who share every conservative value with white evangelical pastors, including pro-life views on abortion, will vote for Obama. They feel their very dignity is on the line.
I remember attending San Jose State College (pre-university days) when Tommie Smith was setting a world record every time he set foot on the track. I recall eating in the campus cafeteria and watching the blacks segregating themselves from the rest of us ... Smith and John Carlos included.

This was during the 60s, when America was trying to right the wrong of white-racism.

I remember being at a Southern Baptist pastors retreat in California about ten years ago, listening to a black pastor and a black youth pastor explain to me and a white friend why they hoped and prayed that we and every other white-American would experience the humiliation and degradation that they felt and had felt.

To our shock they told us they hoped and prayed that this country and its whitey culture would crumble in a heap just so they could see whites go through what their people have gone through.

These were men who were consecrated to spreading the Good News of Jesus Christ - the one known as The Truth, The Life, and The Way!

To this day my friend and I remain dumbfounded because of what we heard these two "men of God" reveal to us at that little round table over coffee.

For 40 years, liberals have described the most open and tolerant society on earth as racist and xenophobic. If Barack Obama loses, the results of this liberal depiction of America may become frighteningly apparent.
The vast majority of Americans ... democrat and republican, black and white, Native and Asian, what ever ... know that the vast majority of Americans are nowhere near racist; yet most liberal Americans, especially those in or out of academia, and the MSM do!
Why do liberals believe that if Obama loses it will be due to white racism?

One reason is the liberal elite's contempt for white Americans with less education -- even if they are Democrats.

A second reason is that it is inconceivable to most liberals that an Obama loss -- especially a narrow one -- will be due to Obama's liberal views or inexperience or to admiration for John McCain.

The third reason is that the further left you go, the more insular you get. Americans on the left tend to talk only to one another; study only under left-wing teachers; and read only fellow leftists. That is why it is a shock to so many liberals when a Republican wins a national election -- where do all these Republican voters come from?
Prager predicts ...
... if Obama loses, liberal rage will focus on millions of fellow Americans and on American society.

And it could become a rage the likes of which America has not seen in a long time, if ever. It will first and foremost come from within black America.
I pray that those who've trained themselves to be colorblind with regard to race will rise up and angrily tell the spoiled liberal brats to be quiet and return to their rugs and finish their nap.